<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>The Walrus</title><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/</link><description>Just some bloke with a bouzouki, saying stuff about narghiles and old Greek records...</description><language>en-EU</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>I've had many of these ! but thanx for the warning David.&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11461956</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:38:50 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I had to laugh...</title><description>You can start it...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/i-had-to-laugh-7344647/#c11460288</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:49:12 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I had to laugh...</title><description>I wish very muchy that he would.....Can we organise a Support Campaign...so he can stop access to his publications? :))&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/i-had-to-laugh-7344647/#c11459747</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:52:58 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I had to laugh...</title><description>I expected that was the reason, but he has no hope. He's so last century...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/i-had-to-laugh-7344647/#c11459687</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:45:55 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I had to laugh...</title><description>That's because he wants to start charging to access his publications.I don't think he understands on line news consumers.   </description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/i-had-to-laugh-7344647/#c11459001</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:38:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Strangeness on eBay</title><description>The real annoyance with eBay is the way they meddle with everything instead of keeping it simple. First they decided people would not buy DVDs unless the postage was free, duh? Then books could not be heavy enough to cost more than £2.75 to post. They are cutting their own throats, and the rise of Amazon for private selling is proof of that.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/strangeness-on-ebay-7344115/#c11458316</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:20:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Strangeness on eBay</title><description>I've been tempted to use Amazon.. their charges did seem more realistic. e-bay... they are beginning to think they are better than everyone. Perhaps they are forgetting the important ingredient of their workability. Us!</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/strangeness-on-ebay-7344115/#c11458209</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:08:14 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Strangeness on eBay</title><description>You wouldn't think they would be so keen on annoying small sellers, but they are. Amazon are a better bet for my sales of decent items...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/strangeness-on-ebay-7344115/#c11457862</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:27:35 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Strangeness on eBay</title><description>Ebay terms and conditions have swung in favour of the buyer and big sellers.Small sellers are now having a hard time.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/strangeness-on-ebay-7344115/#c11457602</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:03:42 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:A planet I visited today.</title><description>I have lost count of my colonies...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/a-planet-i-visited-today-7343608/#c11457329</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:34:12 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:A planet I visited today.</title><description>Will have to have a 'Go' one day; too ocupied learning about IT at the moment...:));)</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/a-planet-i-visited-today-7343608/#c11457259</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:24:34 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Strangeness on eBay</title><description>ebay? their terms and conditions on postage goes against the european comission rules on restrictive business practices, amazing when you a big player? is it not?</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/strangeness-on-ebay-7344115/#c11457172</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:13:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:A planet I visited today.</title><description>It is brilliant fun, and dangerously addictive...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/a-planet-i-visited-today-7343608/#c11456924</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:38:35 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:A planet I visited today.</title><description>This looks interesting - I might give it a try.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/10/a-planet-i-visited-today-7343608/#c11456782</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:21:52 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The healthy chocolate thing revisited.</title><description>Always glad to have been some sort of help!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As I said, the only way to get rich from pyramid schemes is to be at the top. Then you just have your conscience to dael with...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Cheers, Chris</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2008/11/14/the-healthy-chocolate-thing-revisited-5034787/#c11454601</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:05:24 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The healthy chocolate thing revisited.</title><description>Thank you, thank you! &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I wasn't going to fall for the pyramid scheme, but I was willing to try the product. Now that I have read your opinion and the opinions of the more sensible of your visitors, I have decided to let the whole thing slide right down the side of the pyramid!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Lord knows I don't want the negative, needy, pushy energy of MLM to get anywhere close to me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks again, &lt;br&gt;
Peri&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2008/11/14/the-healthy-chocolate-thing-revisited-5034787/#c11454225</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:33:09 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>network yes.......morsecode?</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11444230</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:05:48 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>What about indigestion?</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11443432</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:43:41 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>Some nights I'm so alert I have to eat can after can of beer to get to sleep...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11443161</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:10:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>They get more and more devious. Thanks for the warning.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11442313</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:50:24 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>Thanks Matey! Alert as always...and reliably so! ;)</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11441548</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:41:52 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>No need, our network and all systems on it are locked down rather well. And you didn't say which browser you consider to be "top". Cheers, Walrus</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11441240</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:12:30 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Beware of this one!</title><description>use top anti-virus browser!</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/08/beware-of-this-one-7332708/#c11441183</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:07:56 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I'm keeping this simple for Alan.</title><description>Yes, and I wrote it all by myself!</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/06/i-m-keeping-this-simple-for-alan-7318339/#c11441075</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:58:34 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The fuss about tags.</title><description>Apparently, quite a few people used very long index names to access their posts... as a 1337 nerd, I know how to use tags a different way. As to which is better, who knows, but my way doesn't hammer blog.co.uk servers like those very long ones did...</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-fuss-about-tags-7312398/#c11440987</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:50:28 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I'm keeping this simple for Alan.</title><description>great...astounding.........</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/06/i-m-keeping-this-simple-for-alan-7318339/#c11440805</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:37:50 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The fuss about tags.</title><description>I thought it was just me wondering why the big fuss. Thank you for posting this.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-fuss-about-tags-7312398/#c11434857</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:37:30 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I'm keeping this simple for Alan.</title><description>I swear by "Juke Box Jury" that I have never, ever, ever, seen it.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/06/i-m-keeping-this-simple-for-alan-7318339/#c11426266</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:35:15 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I'm keeping this simple for Alan.</title><description>I refuse to acknowledge the existence of this "X factor" you speak of...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I physically shivered as I wrote that. </description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/06/i-m-keeping-this-simple-for-alan-7318339/#c11424978</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:58:44 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:I'm keeping this simple for Alan.</title><description>Thank you, I'm glad you like it. Sadly, Alan Johnson will probably never see it, and Gordon Brown only has time for "The X Factor", whatever that is.</description><link>http://walrus.blog.co.uk/2009/11/06/i-m-keeping-this-simple-for-alan-7318339/#c11424865</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:41:54 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
